Tibo Colson vs Gilles Arnaud Bailly Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent second serve performances show Bailly winning 39.28% of points, while Colson has achieved 42.13%. Who performs better under this parameter? The answer is Colson.
• In recent return games, Bailly has taken 44.27% of opponents' second serve points, compared to Colson's 47.77%. Colson has a slight edge in this aspect.
• Bailly outperforms on first serve returns, securing 28.63% of points; Colson achieves 21.97%. This advantage might favor Bailly in crucial situations.
• Under pressure, Colson has saved 57.41% of breakpoints, outperforming Bailly who saved 46.01%. Could this indicate stronger resilience for Colson in tough moments?
• The past year's performance shows Bailly winning 64.18% of matches, whereas Colson has won 60.66%. Bailly demonstrates a marginally better win record.
• Bailly shows impressive strength on Hard courts with a 69% win rate, Colson thrives on I.hard surfaces with a 66% win rate.
• Both players have competed largely at the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K level; Bailly holds a 64.06% win rate compared to Colson's 66.67%.
• In terms of opponent quality, Bailly faced stronger players with an average rank of 356.88, compared to Colson's opponents, ranked on average at 449.05.
• If the match progresses to a deciding set, Colson holds a slight edge with 52% victories, against Bailly's 50% success rate in such scenarios.
• Regarding breakpoint conversion, Bailly capitalizes on 37.91% of opportunities, while Colson manages 29.29%, indicating Bailly's potential for critical point conversion.

Editorial Prediction (June 21, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the upcoming match, clear patterns emerge highlighting each player's strengths and weaknesses. Colson demonstrates an edge in second serve performance and resilience under pressure, converting crucial breakpoints more effectively. Their ability to face breakpoints with a higher save percentage could prove vital.

Bailly's strength lies in breaking opponents' serves, especially first serves, giving them a significant opportunity to disrupt Colson's rhythm. With a superior win percentage on Hard surfaces, Bailly may leverage their experience effectively on this type of court. Additionally, Bailly's ability to exploit breakpoint chances could be decisive.

The competition level faced by Bailly, including stronger ranked opponents, could provide an advantage in dealing with high-intensity situations. However, Colson’s better performance in deciding sets suggests they have the endurance and mental fortitude to prevail if the match extends.

Considering all elements, including recent trends and performance patterns, Bailly may have a slight edge in this matchup and is most likely to secure the win in their upcoming encounter.